Vibe-coded: the games and sites

Things I vibe-coded

● As at 3 September 2026, 10:15 pm AEST

Everything here was built by conversation with an AI coding agent. I supplied the idea, context, corrections and taste; the agent turned that into code, tests, pictures and deployments. The honest part is inside every card: what I can measure, what I can only estimate, and what the archive simply does not know.

The title screen of Loryan Quest V, styled like a 1990s Sierra adventure game with a pixel-art portrait and menu.
The title screen of Loryan Quest V, styled like a 1990s Sierra adventure game with a pixel-art portrait and menu.
Game · point-and-click adventure

Loryan Quest V: The Next Distraction

A Sierra-style trip through my cluttered brain. Four rooms, one verb that matters, and a door you never open.

● Live at loryanquestv.strant.com

How it was built
Built 28–29 Aug 2026 · 33 h 59 m elapsed
Active work 6 h 55 m measured · roughly 7–9 h
Sessions / turns 1 Rufus build session · 11 top-level turns · 938 model iterations
Models Claude Opus 5 · Azure Foundry GPT-Image-2
Metered cost US$270.03 language-model usage
Output 29 commits · about 7,095 source lines across 90 tracked files

Measured in the project’s own build report. It also records 900 tool calls. Metered usage is not the amount I personally paid; image generation and hosting are excluded.

A Quidditch match in play, seen from above at twilight: Gryffindor and Slytherin players, each labelled with their position, fly over a marked oval pitch with three golden goal hoops at either end, a scoreboard across the top and a Snitch Watch meter down the right.
A Quidditch match in play, seen from above at twilight: Gryffindor and Slytherin players, each labelled with their position, fly over a marked oval pitch with three golden goal hoops at either end, a scoreboard across the top and a Snitch Watch meter down the right.
Game · top-down match

Quidditch: Twilight Pitch

Fly the Chasers; when the Snitch appears, the game hands you the Seeker and wishes you luck.

○ Not hosted · screenshots only

How it was built
Built 29 Aug 2026
Active work Not measurable from the archive
Sessions / turns 1 session
Models Claude
Metered cost Not available
Evidence Station title match: “Harry Potter Quidditch game”

The archived session for this project is a poor match (elapsed span under ten minutes), so its figures are withheld rather than published as estimates.

The Maze title screen showing an eight-bit desert landscape, a dark maze and a pixel-art host beneath the Westworld-inspired title.
The Maze title screen showing an eight-bit desert landscape, a dark maze and a pixel-art host beneath the Westworld-inspired title.
Game · 8-bit maze

The Maze: an 8-bit Westworld tribute

Collect reveries, dodge hosts stuck in their loops, and try to wake up before your stability runs out.

● Live on GitHub Pages

How it was built
Built 5 Aug 2026 · estimated 2 h 43 m elapsed
Active work Estimated 4 h 45 m across overlapping sessions, including idle gaps
Sessions / turns 2 sessions · 113 estimated turns
Models Azure GPT-5
Metered cost Not available · neither session has cost telemetry
Evidence Station title matches for the game and its 8-bit intro

Estimated from Station’s archive. The summed session duration exceeds the elapsed span because the two sessions overlapped.

The Humbled and Honored website with its playful Microsoft MVP renewal headline and dashboard-style content cards.
The Humbled and Honored website with its playful Microsoft MVP renewal headline and dashboard-style content cards.
Site · MVP renewal season

Humbled & Honored

My light-hearted home for Microsoft MVP renewal season, complete with statistics, a playlist and industrial-strength humblebragging.

● Live at humbledandhonored.com

How it was built
Built 3 Aug–2 Sep 2026
Active work Not measurable from the archive
Sessions / turns 5 sessions
Models Azure GPT-5 · Claude
Metered cost Not available
Evidence Exact Station project match: humbledandhonored

The archived session for this project is a poor match (summed duration exceeds twenty-four hours), so its figures are withheld rather than published as estimates.

The Let Me Correct That For You home page, showing a searchable directory of commonly mistyped Microsoft product names.
The Let Me Correct That For You home page, showing a searchable directory of commonly mistyped Microsoft product names.
Site · terminology directory

Let Me Correct That For You

A polite public service for the moments when a product name is almost right — which is often when it is most wrong.

● Live at letmecorrectthatforyou.com

How it was built
Built 19–20 Aug 2026 AEST · estimated 11 h 28 m elapsed
Active work Estimated 11 h 28 m, including idle gaps
Sessions / turns 1 session · 34 estimated turns
Models Azure GPT-5
Metered cost Not available · the session has no cost telemetry
Evidence Station title match: “Conversion of letmecorrectthatforyou.com”

Estimated from Station’s archived coding session. Hosting and any work outside the archive are not included.

The Rebrand Registry showing a searchable table and timeline of Microsoft cloud products and their former names.
The Rebrand Registry showing a searchable table and timeline of Microsoft cloud products and their former names.
Site · product-name archaeology

The Rebrand Registry

I put Microsoft cloud product names on a timeline because apparently remembering one name per product was too easy.

● Live on an Azure default hostname

How it was built
Built 28 Aug 2026
Active work Not measurable from the archive
Sessions / turns 1 session
Models Claude
Metered cost Not available
Evidence Exact Station project match: Microsoft-Rebrand-Registry

The archived session for this project is a poor match (elapsed span under ten minutes), so its figures are withheld rather than published as estimates.

The Copilot Credit Estimator landing page with a playful enterprise calculator and report controls.
The Copilot Credit Estimator landing page with a playful enterprise calculator and report controls.
Site · deliberately fictional calculator

Copilot Credit Estimator

Pick your ambition, sprinkle in governance, and receive a very serious-looking estimate for an entirely fictional Copilot programme.

● Live on an Azure default hostname

How it was built
Built 2–3 Sep 2026 · estimated 13 h 4 m elapsed
Active work Estimated 13 h 4 m, including idle gaps
Sessions / turns 1 session · 74 estimated turns
Models Azure GPT-5
Metered cost Not available · the session has no cost telemetry
Evidence Station title match: “Joke Copilot Credit Estimator site”

Estimated from Station’s archived coding session. The calculator’s output is satire; these build figures are not.

The Microsoft Cloud Logos website showing its searchable collection of Microsoft product logo tiles.
The Microsoft Cloud Logos website showing its searchable collection of Microsoft product logo tiles.
Site · logo library

Microsoft Cloud Logos

The Microsoft cloud logo drawer I wanted: searchable, downloadable and much less mysterious than hunting through image search.

● Live at mscloudlogos.com

How it was built
Built 14–18 Aug 2026
Active work Not measurable from the archive
Sessions / turns 1 session
Models Azure GPT-5
Metered cost Not available
Evidence Station title match: “Microsoft product name & logo ages”

The archived session for this project is a poor match (summed duration exceeds twenty-four hours), so its figures are withheld rather than published as estimates.

The M365 Copilot Prompt Analyser executive summary dashboard with prompt quality scores and charts.
The M365 Copilot Prompt Analyser executive summary dashboard with prompt quality scores and charts.
Tool · prompt coaching

M365 Copilot Prompt Analyser

I wanted to measure whether prompts were getting better without turning people’s private conversations into the report.

○ Self-hosted tool · no public demo

How it was built
Built Not available in Station’s archive
Active work Not available
Sessions / turns No matching archived coding session found
Models Not recorded
Metered cost Not available
Evidence Repository README and committed screenshots only

The repository predates the complete archive coverage used for this page. I would rather leave a gap than manufacture precision.

The M365 Copilot Usage Reporter overview dashboard with adoption totals, trends and workload charts.
The M365 Copilot Usage Reporter overview dashboard with adoption totals, trends and workload charts.
Tool · adoption reporting

M365 Copilot Usage Reporter

A deployable reporting stack for seeing how Copilot is actually being used, without making Power BI a prerequisite.

○ Self-hosted tool · no public demo

How it was built
Built Not available in Station’s archive
Active work Not available
Sessions / turns No matching archived coding session found
Models Not recorded
Metered cost Not available
Evidence Repository README and committed screenshots only

The repository predates the complete archive coverage used for this page. Missing telemetry is shown as missing, not zero.

The M365 Copilot Cowork Reporter overview with consumption, task and adoption summary cards.
The M365 Copilot Cowork Reporter overview with consumption, task and adoption summary cards.
Tool · Cowork reporting

M365 Copilot Cowork Reporter

One small reporting stack that joins Cowork cost, credits, tasks and adoption without pretending they all come from one tidy API.

○ Self-hosted tool · no public demo

How it was built
Built Not available in Station’s archive
Active work Not available
Sessions / turns No matching archived coding session found
Models Not recorded
Metered cost Not available
Evidence Repository README and committed screenshots only

The source and screenshots exist, but no matching coding session had reached Station’s archive by 3 September 2026.

The Copilot Studio Agent Quality Reporter overview showing agent health scores and improvement findings.
The Copilot Studio Agent Quality Reporter overview showing agent health scores and improvement findings.
Tool · agent quality reporting

Copilot Studio Agent Quality Reporter

A health check for Copilot Studio agents: what is working, what is wobbling, and what to improve next.

○ Self-hosted tool · no public demo

How it was built
Built Not available in Station’s archive
Active work Not available
Sessions / turns No matching archived coding session found
Models Not recorded
Metered cost Not available
Evidence Repository README and committed screenshots only

The repository predates the complete archive coverage used for this page. No public demo is linked because this tool is designed to be deployed into your own environment.

How these numbers were made

Computed on 3 September 2026 from Station’s production coding-session archive, read-only. For each repository I matched exact project names first, then explicit session titles where older sessions had been archived under unknown. “Elapsed” is the first session start to the last session end. “Active work” is the sum of each matched session’s ended_at - started_at; that includes idle gaps and can overlap, so every figure is labelled estimated. “Turns” uses journal_session.message_count, the same field exported as turns by Station’s scripts/coding_sessions_report.py.

Metered US-dollar cost exists only for Rufus sessions represented in session_review_source; where only some matched sessions carry cost, the card says partial, and where none do it says not available. It does not mean the work was free. Loryan Quest V is the exception: its figures are quoted from its own measured build report, which uses the Rufus event log, provider transcript and Git history. The raw card inputs and mapping notes are kept with this page’s source, in a repository that stays private — deliberately, because that file also holds the figures the cards above decided not to publish.